LAZO-GAVIDIA V. GARLAND

Holding that a noncitizen is entitled to rescission of an in absentia removal order if her Notice to Appear did not include time and date information as required under 8 U.S.C. § 1229(a). Judge Rushing, in dissent, would have held that a Notice of Hearing under § 1229(a)(2) can supplement a Notice to Appear missing such information and thus satisfy the notice requirements of the in absentia removal statute, 8 § 1229a(b)(5)(A).

Date of Decision
Published
bW

Sign up to stay involved

Enter your e-mail to receive legal updates, action alerts, and more!