Holding that BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying MTR based on changed country conditions in Cameroon, since the BIA's conclusion that Petitioner's new evidence was largely cumulative and described potential threats similar to those she feared when she applied for asylum previously was not arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law. Senior Circuit Judge Floyd, in dissent, would have held that the new evidence did show a material change in country conditions and would likely change the result in her asylum case.
Date of Decision
Unpublished
